Blog: Myths Part 1

Blog 5 Image 3 Myths (4).jpg

garry circle.PNG

Gary Danks
6th June, 2018


If you’re paying for app installs, you’re paying for fraudulent app installs. It’s as simple as that.
In this series, we debunk some of the myths which help convince marketers they don't have a fraudulent app install problem.

Myths #1 (2).jpg

Myth #1: My app installs have great in-app performance – what’s fraudulent about that?

This is the most common myth we hear and definitely the hardest one for marketers to accept. Unfortunately, the fact that your app installs are real and performing well, doesn't mean you should be paying for them.

It might sound counterintuitive, but this is how attribution fraud works - stealing the attribution from high performing organic installs. There are a couple of methods a fraudulent supplier will use – such as, install hijacking and click stuffing – to take advantage of the last-click attribution model.

Whatever methodology used, the end result is that marketers pay for installs they would have received anyway. Effectively, buying app installs they already own. Stop attribution theft and you’ll pay a lot less, but get the same install volumes and the same in-app conversion results.

In Q1 2018, Machine analysed over 17m app installs. 29 percent of them were detected as attribution theft. If you’d like to understand more about this problem, we’ve recently published this article on attribution fraud.

Myths #2.jpg

Myth #2: Click volumes don't matter to me. My ad network told me it was technical problem.

When you’re buying app installs on a cost-per-install (CPI) basis, why should you be worried about the click volumes? You’re not paying a cost-per-click so it’s not costing you anything, right? Wrong.

Quite often, when advertisers question high click volumes with their ad network ‘partners’, we often hear the excuse “oh, you don't need to worry about those clicks. It’s a technical fault, ignore them.” If you hear this, you definitely should be worried.

It’s a similar situation to one we laid out in Myth #1. High volumes of clicks – and low number of installs – from a single publisher ID is a sign of click stuffing. Fraudsters are trying to game the last click attribution model, sending through thousands of fake clicks in the hope an organic download happens at the same time, so they can steal attribution of a legitimate app install.

Myths #3.jpg

Myth #3: I don't spend enough on app installs to be affected by fraudulent app installs.

It’s true that the big spenders - who spend millions every month paying for app installs - lose the most money to fraudulent app installs. However, in percentages, it’s actually the smaller app business which lose out the most.

Big-spending verticals like gaming and gambling are in most cases – though certainly not all – well aware of the problem, and use services like Machine to protect themselves.

I guarantee, if you’re buying app installs from the market and you’re unprotected from fraud - or have a simple off the shelf product - the majority of what you’re buying is fraudulent. We’ve seen plenty of cases where the app installs are,100 percent fraudulent.

Machine helps marketers to stop fraudulent app installs

Machine is the only company completely dedicated to stopping app install fraud. It’s all we do. This is why our technology - and team - stop more install fraud than any other service in the market. We guarantee this.

InsightsGary Danks